For the Giants to take down the Packers on Sunday night, they're going to have to get after Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers. As is the case in any game, the better the Giants do in disrupting the quarterback, the better chance they have of winning.
The big decision, though, will be how much pressure to send at Rodgers. Do the Giants just rely on their front four to win their battles and get there, or do they need to send extra blitzers to try and take down the reigning MVP?
According to ESPN Stats & Information, the Giants were successful against Green Bay last season when they sent five or more rushers, sacking Rodgers every 5.8 times he dropped back. When the team had four or fewer rushers, Rodgers only was sacked once every 43 snaps.
Additionally, Stats & Information says the Giants have just 15 sacks with their standard pass rush this year, compared to 21 at this point last season. The Giants' front four hasn't been able to rush with the same effectiveness it did last year, which means they might need to dial up some more heat against the most-sacked quarterback in the league.
While sending extra rushers seems like a simple way to get after Rodgers, the more rushers sent means the less coverage the Giants have on the back end. Green Bay has one of the best passing games in the league with receivers like Jordy Nelson, Randall Cobb and James Jones, and tight end Jermichael Finley is one of the most athletic tight ends in the game.
If the Giants bring the house, that means there are better chances of Nelson and co. getting one-on-one battles, which is what the Packers would prefer. The Giants secondary has struggled this year and if Green Bay can isolate certain matchups, it's going to try to exploit them all day. Green Bay is explosive enough to win those matchups, too.
Ultimately, Giants defensive coordinator Perry Fewell is going to have to find the right mix. If he gets too reliant on his front four, and they don't get to Rodgers, the MVP will slice and dice the defense. If he sends too many rushers, the Packers will have one-on-one matchups and a beleaguered secondary is going to have to step up to the task.
The big decision, though, will be how much pressure to send at Rodgers. Do the Giants just rely on their front four to win their battles and get there, or do they need to send extra blitzers to try and take down the reigning MVP?
According to ESPN Stats & Information, the Giants were successful against Green Bay last season when they sent five or more rushers, sacking Rodgers every 5.8 times he dropped back. When the team had four or fewer rushers, Rodgers only was sacked once every 43 snaps.
Additionally, Stats & Information says the Giants have just 15 sacks with their standard pass rush this year, compared to 21 at this point last season. The Giants' front four hasn't been able to rush with the same effectiveness it did last year, which means they might need to dial up some more heat against the most-sacked quarterback in the league.
While sending extra rushers seems like a simple way to get after Rodgers, the more rushers sent means the less coverage the Giants have on the back end. Green Bay has one of the best passing games in the league with receivers like Jordy Nelson, Randall Cobb and James Jones, and tight end Jermichael Finley is one of the most athletic tight ends in the game.
If the Giants bring the house, that means there are better chances of Nelson and co. getting one-on-one battles, which is what the Packers would prefer. The Giants secondary has struggled this year and if Green Bay can isolate certain matchups, it's going to try to exploit them all day. Green Bay is explosive enough to win those matchups, too.
Ultimately, Giants defensive coordinator Perry Fewell is going to have to find the right mix. If he gets too reliant on his front four, and they don't get to Rodgers, the MVP will slice and dice the defense. If he sends too many rushers, the Packers will have one-on-one matchups and a beleaguered secondary is going to have to step up to the task.

- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk
Justin Tuck added something new to his offseason regimen: Seeing Tony Robbins and walking over hot coals #NYG http://t.co/Tmgb51Kfbw
about 4 hours ago
- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk

- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk
Tisch on Cruz: 'It's just taking its time' http://t.co/i4SdDkjrMX
about 6 hours ago
- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk

- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk
@AKinkhabwala Did you take the bike ride down? Hope you are having a terrific time! Congrats!
about 7 hours ago
- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk

- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk
Tisch on XLVIII weather: 'It could be great' -- from @MikeRodak http://t.co/1Z53wvIDu5
about 8 hours ago
- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk

- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk
> RT @AdamSchefter: Maybe he picks Denver, but Charles Woodson is intrigued with idea of finishing career in same place he started: Oakland.
1 day ago
- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk

- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk
Arizona State coaches study Coughlin http://t.co/W7tmTcMQ2H
1 day ago
- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk

- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk
RT @Rebecca_Octagon #Giants fans tune in to @RachaelRayShow tomorrow to catch @JustinTuckNYG91 talk his book, #TucksRUSH4Literacy & family!
1 day ago
- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk

- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk
>> RT “@caplannfl: The Eagles are expected to waive UDFA RB Miguel Maysonet, per source. Certainly a surprise.”
2 days ago
- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk

- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk
Pressure-free Aaron Curry believes he can be an impact linebacker for #NYG http://t.co/XQ2ckrDEqJ
3 days ago
- NotoriousOHM Ohm Youngmisuk




TWITTER


You must be signed in to post a comment