Pac-12: Oregon State Beavers

Mailbag: Beaming for Tom Bradley

February, 25, 2015
Feb 25
After a brief hiatus (literally, I did nothing but sit around in my briefs and binge watch "Bates Motel"), I’m back with a mailbag -- at least this personality is. Follow me on Twitter, it will make my mom happy.

To the notes!

Joe Bruin in Westwood writes: I am a happy Bruin after finding out that Jim Mora has hired a quality coach in Tom Bradley. The defense has definitely been the weakest link in the Jim Mora era. How big of an impact, if any, does this hire have on our team? How confident do you feel that UCLA, with the addition of Coach Bradley, is going to compete for the Pac-12 title, and ultimately grab a spot in the playoffs?

Kevin Gemmell: It’s never a bad thing to add quality and experience, which is exactly what Bradley brings to the table. And to get that kind of a coach in late February, after a lot of the staff changes have already happened across the country, is pretty significant.

As for the defense being the “weak link” of the Mora tenure, I guess it depends on what your definition of weak is. Looking at it year by year:
  • In 2012 UCLA ranked eighth in the league in scoring defense (27.6), eighth in total defense (415.9 ypg), third in sacks (47), fourth in third-down defense (32.8 percent) and fourth in turnover margin (plus-7).
  • In 2013 the Bruins were fifth in scoring defense (23.2), fifth in total defense (385.9), sixth in sacks (32), third in third-down defense (34.9), and third in turnover margin (plus-10).
  • Last year they were seventh in scoring defense (28.1), third in total defense (398.5), tied for eighth in sacks (29), eighth in third-down defense (39.9) and eighth in turnover margin (even).

Are those “weak” numbers? Scoring defense hasn’t broken the 30-point mark (the Bruins were over 30 points in the final two years of the Rick Neuheisel era). The third-down defense was in the 40 percent range prior to Mora’s arrival. The trend here is UCLA’s defense is better under Mora than it was previously.

Whether Bradley pushes the Bruins into the upper-echelon of the conference -- i.e., the top two or three spots in each of those categories -- remains to be seen. The drop-off in sacks last year makes sense when you take guys like Anthony Barr and Cassius Marsh out of the equation and pair it with a new defensive coordinator.

Don’t get too caught up in the odd-front vs. even-front argument either. This is an experienced staff that can adjust on the fly either way. Besides, few teams in the Pac-12 are married anymore to just one front. There is so much disguising and diversity because of the range of offenses that “base” defenses fluctuate.

That’s the long answer. Short answer, be excited to nab a quality defensive-minded coach this late in the game.

Travis in Truckee writes: Seeing as draft day is the next real big event that pertains to college football, I'm curious who the blog thinks has the biggest potential to be an under-the-radar steal (a late rounder who winds up contributing heavily over the long haul) out of the Pac-12 this year. Cheers.

Kevin Gemmell: I’d say spring ball is pretty significant. We’ll be ramping up our coverage on all of the teams in the next few weeks. So don’t just disappear until April 30. Hang out for a while.

As for sleepers, if I could say with any certainty, they probably wouldn’t be under the radar, now would they?

So much depends on where they go, who the coach is and what’s the system. I think of Brandin Cooks, for example, being a phenomenal fit for New Orleans. Had he gone somewhere else, he might have been good, but maybe he doesn’t break 50 catches in his first season.

Granted, he was a first-round pick, so not exactly under the radar. I’m just using him as an example of right place, right system, right teammates.

Then you have someone like Cameron Fleming, drafted late in the fourth, making a contribution on a Super Bowl-winning team.

I think a guy like Sean Mannion could end up making a general manager look really, really smart. I’ve seen him projected around the third round. Chances are he goes to a team where he can sit for a year or two, learn the game without the “win now” pressure that Marcus Mariota or Jameis Winston -- or maybe even Brett Hundley and Bryce Petty -- are going to be facing.

He has all of the physical tools to be a very good pocket quarterback. He understands defenses and he spent his entire career learning from a former NFL coach. While the NFL is tinkering more with zone reads and athletic quarterbacks are en vogue, it’s still a game built on solid quarterback fundamentals. Mannion has those. Given the right situation, I think he could be a very nice sleeper.

Dale in Stockton, Calif., writes: What is the latest news on DT Kenny Bigelow.

Kevin Gemmell: I reached out to my super-duper secret sources at USC … OK, I emailed Garry Paskwietz from WeAreSC … and he gave me the scoop.

Sounds like Bigelow is participating fully in the conditioning sessions. Media isn’t allowed in those, but according to Paskwietz, Bigelow left the field this morning “drenched in sweat.” So either he’s been living it up in the steam room, or he’s grinding.

There’s no official word on how much he’ll be participating in spring ball. But I imagine as we get closer to the Trojans kicking off on March 3, we’ll start to get a little more info on his status. Sounds like he’s been pretty active. Which is a good sign.
Last week your humble Pac-12 Blog broke down the 2015 Pac-12 recruiting class and where those players came from. But those kinds of numbers always prompt more questions like: OK, this is one class, what about the last two classes? The last three? What about every class that each Pac-12 coach has signed?

Well, your humble Pac-12 Blog is back. And it's back with those answers (with signees by state).

Rich Rodriguez, four classes -- 98 signees, 11 ESPN 300 members
  • California: 41
  • Arizona: 16
  • Texas: 9
  • Florida: 7
  • Louisiana: 5
  • Colorado: 3
  • Two signees: Georgia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia
  • One signee: Canada, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, Nevada, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Washington
Todd Graham, four classes -- 100 signees, seven ESPN 300 members
  • California: 46
  • Arizona: 17
  • Florida: 7
  • Louisiana: 6
  • Three signees: Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas
  • Two signees: Nevada, Washington, Washington D.C.
  • One signee: Canada, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, New York, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah

Sonny Dykes, three classes -- 71 signees, four ESPN 300 members
  • California: 49
  • Texas: 6
  • Three signees: Arizona, Washington
  • Two signees: Hawaii, Mississippi, Oregon
  • One signee: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana

Mike MacIntyre, three classes -- 66 signees, no ESPN 300 members
  • California: 33
  • Colorado: 14
  • Texas: 8
  • Arizona: 3
  • Two signees: Hawaii, Utah
  • One signee: Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, Washington

Mark Helfrich, three classes -- 63 signees, 17 ESPN 300 members
  • California: 26
  • Oregon: 5
  • Four signees: Arizona, Texas, Washington
  • Three signees: Florida, Georgia, Hawaii
  • Two signees: Louisiana, Nevada
  • One signee: Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Tennessee

Gary Andersen, one class -- 22 signees, no ESPN 300 members
  • Utah: 6
  • Four signees: California, Florida
  • Two signees: Oregon, Texas
  • One signee: American Samoa, Arizona, Hawaii, Louisiana

David Shaw, five classes -- 95 signees, 26 ESPN 300 members
  • California: 25
  • Georgia: 7
  • Six signees: Arizona, Florida, Texas
  • Five signees: Utah, Washington
  • Four signees: Louisiana
  • Three signees: North Carolina
  • Two signees: Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, Virginia
  • One signee: Hawaii, Indiana, Idaho, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Washington D.C.

Jim Mora, four classes -- 92 signees, 31 ESPN 300 members
  • California: 55
  • Texas: 10
  • Arizona: 5
  • Three signees: Florida, Georgia, Hawaii
  • Two signees: Delaware
  • One signee: Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana, Louisiana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, Washington

Steve Sarkisian, two classes -- 43 signees, 25 ESPN 300 members
  • California: 32
  • Texas: 3
  • Two signees: Florida, Utah
  • One signee: Georgia, Idaho, Nevada, Oklahoma

Kyle Whittingham, five classes* -- 108 signees, 0 ESPN 300 members
  • California: 40
  • Utah: 29
  • Texas: 15
  • Florida: 8
  • Louisiana: 6
  • Nevada: 3
  • Two signees: Arizona, Hawaii
  • One signee: Maryland, New Jersey, New York

*This is only counting Whittingham's classes that he recruited into the Pac-12 conference (so, starting with the 2011 signing class since the Utes made it official on June 22, 2010).


Chris Petersen, two classes -- 49 signees, 4 ESPN 300 members
  • California: 28
  • Washington: 14
  • Idaho: 2
  • One signee: Maryland, Montana, Oregon, Texas, Wyoming

Mike Leach, four classes -- 102 signees, one ESPN 300 members
  • California: 57
  • Washington: 14
  • American Samoa: 7
  • Three signees: Arizona, Florida, Hawaii, Texas
  • Two signees: Alabama, Georgia
  • One signee: Colorado, Delaware, Louisiana, Maryland, Montana, Oregon, Oklahoma, Utah

There are 20 states from which no current Pac-12 South coach has ever signed a player, and 18 from which no current North coaches have never signed a player. Of those states, 11 are overlapping, meaning that no player from the following states has been signed to a current Pac-12 coach during his tenure as head coach -- Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

It's not surprising that no players has been signed from Wyoming, Vermont, Alaska or North Dakota because those are the four least-populated states in the U.S. What is surprising is that only three players have been signed from the state of Alabama -- two to Mike Leach and one to Sonny Dykes.

Long story short: If you're a high school prospect and you want to play in the Pac-12, it doesn't hurt to live in California, Florida or Texas (if you live outside of "Pac-12 territory"). If you're a high school prospect and you live in Wisconsin or West Virginia -- even though some of these coaches have been head coaches in those states, your chances don't look good at all.

Eleven of the 12 programs have signed the most players from the state of California during current coaches' tenures. The only coach who hasn't is Oregon State coach Gary Andersen, but California is tied for second-most on his list.

North coaches have signed -- on average -- three classes per coach while the South coaches have signed -- on average -- four per. While it's really only a difference of one class, it is a difference of 20-30 student athletes per coach, so really the possibility of 120-180 different home states.

In the South the most recruited states outside of California and home states -- as a whole -- are Florida and Texas. Again, this might not be surprising considering how talent-rich both of those states are, but the only Pac-12 South coach who has ever coached in one of those states is Todd Graham (Rice).

In the North, it's a bit more of a mash-up. The states of Arizona and Washington are big for Cal and Oregon. Florida is big for Oregon State and Stanford. Chris Petersen really hasn't had to reach out of California or Washington, much like his in-state foe, Mike Leach. However, Leach also likes to go to American Samoa, where he has signed seven players.

USC has had the most success with the top recruits. Fifty-eight percent of Sarkisian's recruits are ESPN 300 members. After him, the next most "successful" recruiting coaches are Mora (33.7 percent), Shaw (31.6 percent) and Helfrich (27 percent).

Signing top recruits certainly gives teams a boost on the field as evidenced by the teams above and the successes they've had under each coach. But look at Utah. Whittingham hasn't signed a single ESPN 300 player and yet his team was in the hunt for the South title last season. It's the same with Rich Rodriguez: Even though just 7 percent of his players have been ESPN 300 members, he has still had major success on the field for the Wildcats.
The NFL Combine kicks off on Friday.

Here’s a breakdown of which Pac-12 players will be appearing on which days.

FRIDAY, FEB. 20 | Specialists, offensive linemen, tight ends

Offensive linemen:
Tight ends: SATURDAY, FEB. 21 | Quarterbacks, running backs, wide receivers

Running backs:
Wide receivers: SUNDAY, FEB. 22 | Defensive linemen, linebackers

Defensive linemen:
Linebackers: MONDAY, FEB. 23 | Defensive backs
CORVALLIS, Ore. -- In one of the very first meetings of the year, new Oregon State coach Gary Andersen sat down his team and gave a very blunt message. For the players who had been around for a couple of seasons with Mike Riley -- who’s often billed as “the nicest man” in college football -- it was probably a bit of a change of pace.

“There aren’t 105 kids that are going to buy into you,” Andersen said. “And I told them that one of the first days. I said, ‘You all won’t make it at the end of the day. I want you to [make it]. Prove me wrong.’”

[+] EnlargeGary Andersen
Susan Ragan/USA TODAY SportsGary Andersen is aiming to upgrade an Oregon State run game that finished 11th in the Pac-12 in 2014.
Very un-Riley-like, indeed.

But Andersen said that he has made the exact same statement at each of his previous head coaching stops -- at Wisconsin in 2013, at Utah State in 2009, at Southern Utah in 2003.

“I don’t mean that in a negative way that they’re not going to make it, like they’re going to get kicked off the team. I just mean that there’s going to be change and with the change you have to either accept it and believe in it or you need to change what you’re doing to be happy,” Andersen went on. “I think we run the best program in the country for kids … but again, you’re not going to make 105 of them happy.”

For the Beaver players, it’s going to be a completely new program -- that’s not unique to this coaching change.

But what makes it unique is how this change came after Riley, a coach that held a 14-year tenure -- one of the longest in the nation. Just over two months ago, this team thought its coach would be in Corvallis until he retired. Now, they’re learning new verbiage and schemes.

And, there’s very little connection to the previous regime -- just wide receivers coach Brett Brennan and a handful of graduate assistants.

But the transition is going as well as it could, according to Andersen.

The players got iPads so they could begin learning the new system and verbiage, which will most likely sound and look pretty different from the past few seasons in Corvallis.

“There will be carryover but I would say it will be limited,” Andersen said.

Offensively, Andersen is describing his offense not as a pro style or spread, but instead as a “wide open” offense. Essentially meaning that he’s hoping the Beavers will be able to play fast when need be, to play slow when they need to, and to be able to function from several formations.

Some of the biggest schematic differences were already made clear when Andersen inked his first recruiting class after less than a month on the job. The Beavers signed a single quarterback in the 2015 class -- 6-foot-3 dual-threat QB Seth Collins.

And the other five quarterbacks on the Oregon State roster? Not dual-threat players.

On top of that, Andersen’s offenses have featured the likes of Robert Turbin and Melvin Gordon. Last season, despite Riley speaking ad nauseum about wanting to create a run game, the Beavers finished 11th in the Pac-12 and never created anything that was consistent or effective.

In the spirit of change, the Beavers signed four running backs, three of which are in their top six-ranked signees.

Defensively, the same amount of change can be expected but it might be easier to input considering the Beavers lost nine defensive starters. So rather than having players who’ve already contributed and adjusting them into different roles, Andersen will be building more from the ground up with guys who’ve had less game experience.

For Andersen, he’s billing it as a positive rather than a negative that so much of the defensive contributors from a season ago need to be replaced.

“It’s a tremendous opportunity that’s presented for a bunch of young players,” he said.

Though there might be “opportunities” on either side of the ball, those will be earned by the players who can adjust themselves into Andersen’s program and the Beavers’ new way of life.

Though how many of those 105 players make it through remains to be seen, and Andersen is being realistic and honest about that. But so far, so good for the first-year coach.

“I think that [statement] took them back a little bit,” Andersen said. “But so far they’ve proven me wrong.”
CORVALLIS, Ore. -- Basketball at Oregon State’s Gill Coliseum this season has been pretty exciting as the men’s team has gone 14-0 at home and the women’s team is experiencing an unprecedented season, up to No. 7 in the AP poll with a record of 23-2.

But don’t think that’s the only exciting basketball happening on the Beavers’ campus.

Just west of Gill stands the men’s and women’s practice facility, and during most lunches a handful of Oregon State football coaches and graduate assistants can be found running the court.

“Barack Obama plays basketball,” new defensive coordinator Kalani Sitake said. “We should probably learn something from that -- be competitive and stay in shape.”

The basketball might be played on a slightly different level (read: incredibly different level) than that of the players who actually train to play the game in the same facilities -- Sitake noted that they “probably do this building wrong by playing basketball in here” -- but the intensity of the game is undeniable and the competitive streaks of coaches and former players certainly shows through in the games.

Profanity is thrown between coaches (more reliably than the basketball) and the ratio of turnovers-to-made 3s is probably in the 4:1 category.

During any given cross section of play lasting a minute, the coaches might go 0-for-4 or 1-for-4 from the field (both of these happened on Wednesday) while attempting two rainbow passes during the same period.

But, like the actual men’s and women’s basketball teams know, there is a natural pulse to the game and when players get hot, their teammates feed the hot hand. There might be a six-minute scoring drought but the next four possessions could contain behind-the-back passes, made 3s and consecutive buckets.

“We’re a bunch of guys who are just trying to run stuff that we learned on video games or from watching March Madness,” Sitake said. “We don’t know anything. We’re just trying to screen away and set up picks. … It all sounds good but it’s a lot harder than it looks on TV.”

During Wednesday’s scrimmage 12 men showed up to play so the coaches did a four-on-four-on-four, which, as Sitake pointed out, minimized fast breaks and cherry-picking, which the grad assistants tend to do when playing against some of the older coaches.

They play to 15 by ones and teams are divvied up as evenly as possible to keep the game competitive.

The general scouting report is that graduate assistants Brian Wozniak, Andrew Seumalo and Keegan Andersen are the top picks, running backs coach Telly Lockette plays basketball like he plays running back and everyone else gives about 100 percent.

This certainly isn’t the first football staff to play pick up ball together but it’s a good way for a new group to get to know each other and exercise a little bit. Coach Gary Andersen has only been out to play once so far during his tenure, but Sitake said Andersen is welcome to come and be a big man for his team any day.

But for now, Andersen is going to stick to the treadmill and the field. And from a professional perspective, the rest of the coaches and graduate assistants should too. And that’s probably a very smart decision.
Signing day has come and gone and with it an entirely new batch of Pac-12 players is joining the conference (269 players, to be exact).

With the Pac-12 gaining more national recognition, it’s no surprise to see the recruiting trends heading further outside of what was typically considered “Pac-12 territory.”

For example, the most heavily recruited area was -- unsurprisingly -- the West Coast and states that are the home to one or more Pac-12 programs. But right after that, the next-biggest target was the South and Southeast: SEC territory. The Pac-12 signed the same number of recruits from Texas as it did Arizona. Louisiana was a big state for the conference as well -- Pac-12 schools signed 13 players from the Bayou State.

Here’s a closer look at where exactly the conference picked up its Class of 2015 talent:

  • One obvious note is the number of players from California -- players from the Golden State account for 48 percent of Pac-12 signees in 2015. That’s not too surprising, considering how large and talent-rich the state is. Of the top 25 players in California, 21 signed with Pac-12 schools. The other four signed with Alabama, Tennessee, Notre Dame and San Jose State.
  • Each Pac-12 program signed at least one player from California in the 2015 class (that’s the only state with which that’s true this season). On average, there are 11 signees from California in each recruiting class this season. Though it’s USC who leads the way with 17 signees from California, Washington State was right on the Trojans’ heels with 16 signees from Cali.
  • The state of Washington showed out pretty well in the conference. While there was only one player from Washington in the ESPN 300, there were 16 signees from the state who landed with Pac-12 programs.
  • The only program to not sign a player from the program’s home state was Oregon. However, there were five players from Oregon that did sign with Pac-12 programs. Those players ended up at Arizona (1), Oregon State (2), Stanford (1) and Washington (1).
  • Players staying home: Arizona and Arizona State signed seven players from Arizona; California, Stanford, UCLA and USC signed 48 players from California; Colorado signed four players from Colorado; Oregon State signed two players from Oregon; Utah signed three players from Utah; and Washington and Wazzu signed a total of nine players from Washington.
  • The most national class (meaning the team that signed the players from the most number of states) was Stanford, which signed players from 13 states. The least national class was USC, which signed players from just six states.

But what about the concentration of top talent in the 2015 class?

Again, unsurprisingly, California leads the way. The Golden State makes up half of the four-star and five-star players in the 2015 Pac-12 class. USC snagged five-star cornerback Iman Marshall, who hails from Long Beach, California, and 33 of the 66 four-stars in the 2015 class are also from California.

But this is where there’s a bit of a changeup. Of the 14 players from Texas that signed in the 2015 class, five (36 percent) are four-star players who landed at Pac-12 programs. After that -- with the exception of three four-star players from Georgia -- the majority of the top talent, again, hails from the traditional Pac-12 region.

[+] EnlargeChris Clark
Joe Faraoni/ESPN ImagesIt's not often that the Pac-12 pulls top prospects from Connecticut, such as UCLA-bound tight end Chris Clark.

  • Hawaii: 1
  • California: 1

  • California: 33
  • Texas: 5
  • Washington: 4
  • Arizona: 3
  • Georgia: 3
  • Utah: 3
  • Two four-star signees: Louisiana, North Carolina, Nevada, Oklahoma
  • One four-star signee: South Carolina, Colorado, Missouri, Tennessee, Florida, Connecticut, Hawaii

More notes:

  • Notably, the conference signed a four-star and five-star player from Hawaii. There were only four players in the state that were four- or five-star players. The two players who didn’t sign with a Pac-12 team went to Texas Tech and BYU. Both had Pac-12 offers.
  • The conference also cleaned up -- in regard to snagging the limited top talent out of state -- in Nevada. There were only three four-star players in Nevada and two ended up in the Pac-12 (UCLA and USC). The other player signed with Notre Dame.
  • More impressively, the conference was able to sign one of two four-star players out of Connecticut (TE Chris Clark, UCLA). When considering the distance between Nevada and the Pac-12 and Connecticut and the Pac-12, this is quite a recruiting feat.

As these players get more into the programs and possibly become big Pac-12 contributors, it will only open up these national pipelines more, making the conference’s footprint even bigger.
CORVALLIS, Ore. -- New Oregon State and former Wisconsin head coach Gary Andersen found himself in a pretty strange situation as he watched the College Football Playoff national title game last month.

Andersen was watching a former conference rival (Ohio State) take on a future conference rival (Oregon).

So when the Buckeyes began to roll, he could be thankful he wouldn't be facing them regularly. But he'll play the Ducks on the final Saturday of November every single season with his new team. Not exactly the most calming situation for any coach.

The thought wasn't lost on Andersen, but he said he tried to take in the game mostly as a fan, watching with friends and family.

Though Andersen said he really only watched 60-70 percent of the snaps, he did say he took in a few of the X's and O's of the game that day.

"[I was] more of a fan, but certain things always catch your eye," Andersen said.

So, what was it that caught his eye?

"I'm always drawn to the defensive side of things. Obviously, that day [against OSU] we didn't play that well on the other side of the ball," Andersen said of Wisconsin's meeting with Ohio State, "and so I would see how [the Buckeyes] were attacking them, what they were playing."

The Buckeyes attacked Oregon's odd-front defense in several ways -- with 246 yards on the ground from Ezekiel Elliott; with 242 yards through the air from Cardale Jones; with four different receivers registering at least 45 receiving yards.

But even though he didn't watch the full game snap-for-snap he did see an overwhelming truth: that both teams very much deserved a spot in that matchup. The only bad thing for Andersen about that truth is that even though he got farther from one of those teams, he only got closer to the other.

"[Ohio State was] a very powerful team the day that we played them, and I think they just continued down those same lines," Andersen said. "Oregon was much the same, watching them from afar. ... I believe they deserved to be there, and they both found their way to win the games they had to [in order] to get into the championship game."

And what were his thoughts on the final? Did the team that dismantled his former Wisconsin team in the Big Ten championship game deserve that crown? Or should it have gone to the team that will loom large every November from here on out?

"The way it came out and the way Ohio State played through the playoffs," Andersen said, "I thought they definitely proved they -- last year -- were the best team in the country."
The Ultimate ESPN 300 is loaded with 14 Pac-12 prospects who didn’t make their respective ESPN 150 or ESPN 300 rankings, so trimming that list to the top five who outperformed their initial rankings and became surprise stars at the college level wasn’t easy. The state of Oregon led the way on this list, but Arizona State and Stanford were also home to a few college stars who didn’t receive the same level of recruiting attention as others.

Biggest shoes to fill: Oregon State

February, 16, 2015
Feb 16
Players come and go.

In a perfect world, the teams only have to reload, not rebuild. But following this season, there are a lot of shoes that need to be filled due to early departures and expected graduations.

That leaves the question: Will these spots be reloading or rebuilding? Your humble Pac-12 blog takes a look at some of the biggest shoes that need to be filled entering the 2015 season.

Oregon State Beavers

Biggest shoes: DE/DT Dylan Wynn

In our effort to avoid the obvious in this series -- you know, always tapping QBs for teams with spring competitions ahead behind center -- we're not going with Sean Mannion here, though his shoes are obviously quite roomy. Cornerback Steven Nelson, who joined Wynn on the second-team All-Pac-12 defense, also would be a good candidate. But Wynn started 44 games, tied for seventh most in Oregon State history, so the void he leaves behind is one that stretches back four years. For the past two seasons, he's led Beavers defensive linemen in tackles. In 2014, he tied for the team lead with 12.0 tackles for a loss and 4.5 sacks. He was versatile enough to play end and tackle. Moreover, he was a tone-setter, a high-motor guy who made plays on want-to more than athletic ability. While the Beavers didn't play good defense in 2014, Wynn was a bright spot. With a new, defensive-minded head coach in Gary Andersen and a new scheme with coordinator Kalani Sitake, as well as just three returning starters on defense, it's going to be important this spring for someone to step into Wynn's spot and take the reins of the defense. As everyone knows, it starts up front.

Stepping in: Senior Lavonte Barnett

As it stands now, Barnett and Jaswha James appear to be the likely starters at defensive end for the Beavers. Barnett started four games and James seven in 2014. The reason Barnett headlines here is he was more productive, in fact tying Wynn for the team lead with 4.5 sacks, despite missing two games with an ankle injury. Barnett is a good athlete with a nice burst off the ball, and he's been hinting at big things for two years now. It's his time to step up. Or perhaps some youngsters will make their move under a new administration, such as Luke Hollingsworth or Titus Failauga.

College football is a game driven by offense, seemingly as much as it ever has been. And yet, in our review of the best Power 5 coordinator hires in this cycle, eight of the top 10 coaches in new places are defensive coordinators.

Maybe that's because when offensive coordinators move, they become head coaches? Or maybe it's because the balance of the sport could eventually swing back toward defense? Or both?

To continue reading this article you must be an Insider

We continue our series looking at some of the top individual performances in the Pac-12 in 2014. If you feel a little nostalgic, you can check out the top performances from 2013.

Up next: D.J. & the Doctor heal the Beavers

Who and against whom: Oregon State senior linebackers Michael Doctor and D.J. Alexander make huge fourth quarter plays to finish off No. 6 Arizona State 35-27 in one of the Pac-12's biggest upsets of the season.

The numbers: Doctor picked off Sun Devils QB Taylor Kelly and went 35 yards for a touchdown that gave the Beavers a 35-27 lead with 1:38 remaining. Alexander then sealed the deal with a sack of Kelly on fourth-and-2 with 1:10 left.

A closer look: Oregon State didn't have a good season, finishing 5-7, their fourth season in five years with at least six defeats. Then, with grumpiness growing over the state of the program, particularly in comparison to rival Oregon, coach Mike Riley bolted for Nebraska. This victory over the Sun Devils, in fact, was their only quality win. It pretty much came from nowhere, as the Sun Devils, who had played their way into longshot contention for the College Football Playoff, led 24-14 at halftime and seemed to be coasting toward an expected win. Yet the Beavers, losers of four in a row, got off the canvas and rallied for the victory, mostly behind a defense that shut down ASU in the second half, allowing just three points. Alexander finished with seven tackles, including two for a loss, and Doctor added five. The pair combined for 70 starts in their careers, and in 2011 they seemed like one of the conference's bright young linebacking tandems. Neither career came together as hoped for in Corvallis, with injuries being an issue, but this was one shining moment for them and their team in 2014.
How resilient was your defense in 2014?

Last Thursday, we looked at the teams in the Pac-12 and how well they produced points after turnovers. This was the South Division, and here was the North. Now, we look at the flip side.

It can be frustrating when, after a big defensive stand, the offense coughs it up and gives the ball right back. Time for the defense to take the field again, be it inside their own red zone, the 50 or the opponent’s 1-yard line. (Or if you’re Shaq Thompson, just run it back 100 yards.)

Just like offensive points off of turnovers, there are exceptions. Sometimes a team gets a turnover at the end of the half or a game, so the defense doesn’t have to make a stand. So these numbers aren’t completely cut-and-dried. But rather it’s a measuring stick.

We looked at the South earlier today, and now we turn our attention to the North. If you’re curious how your team did last year, here are the numbers for the South and the numbers for the North.


Turnovers committed: 20
Opponent scores vs. opportunities: 10-20 (50 percent)
Total points allowed after turnovers: 69
Games without committing at least one turnover: 2
Games without allowing points after turnovers: 3


Turnovers committed: 11
Opponent scores vs. opportunities: 3-11 (27 percent)
Total points allowed after turnovers: 13
Games without committing at least one turnover: 7
Games without allowing points after turnovers: 5

Oregon State

Turnovers committed: 14
Opponent scores vs. opportunities: 9-14 (64 percent)
Total points allowed after turnovers: 43
Games without committing at least one turnover: 3
Games without allowing points after turnovers: 3


Turnovers committed: 21
Opponent scores vs. opportunities: 6-21 (28 percent)
Total points allowed after turnovers: 38
Games without committing at least one turnover: 1
Games without allowing points after turnovers: 7


Turnovers committed: 17
Opponent scores vs. opportunities: 10-17 (58 percent)
Total points allowed after turnovers: 53
Games without committing at least one turnover: 5
Games without allowing points after turnovers: 2

Washington State

Turnovers committed: 25
Opponent scores vs. opportunities: 18-25 (72 percent)
Total points allowed after turnovers: 114
Games without committing at least one turnover: 2
Games without allowing points after turnovers: 1

2016 recruits to watch in the Pac-12 

February, 6, 2015
Feb 6
Signing day for the Class of 2015 just wrapped up, but coaches have been hard at work on the 2016 class for months. Oregon and USC each already have three ESPN Junior 300 prospects committed, and UCLA holds a commitment from the No. 53 overall prospect, tight end Breland Brandt.

Here are five uncommitted 2016 prospects to watch in the West region who will be of particular interest to Pac-12 programs.

To continue reading this article you must be an Insider

Pac-12 morning links

February, 6, 2015
Feb 6
You're gonna need a bigger boat.

Happy Friday.

Leading off

February 4 is long gone, but don't think that the drama of national signing day has vanished with the date. UCLA is still at the center of some national attention because linebacker Roquan Smith, one of their touted Wednesday commits, hasn't faxed his national letter of intent to Westwood. Smith is reportedly concerned that Bruins defensive coordinator Jeff Ulbrich has been in talks with the Atlanta Falcons, news that leaked shortly after Smith's commitment to UCLA but before his pledge to the Bruins became binding.

Smith may feel fortunate that he's not in the same boat as Ohio State recruit Mike Weber, who found Buckeyes running backs coach Stan Drayton was leaving to the NFL after he was locked into Urban Meyer's program.

In the case of Smith, UCLA, Georgia, Michigan, and Texas A&M are still technically alive in the battle for his services, and the saga will likely stretch into next week.

"[The recruiting period] isn't over until the end of April," Smith's coach said. "So there's no rush."

So in case any Pac-12 recruiting fans thought signing day would present a cut and dry finish to the 2015 cycle, think again. We're going to overtime, and it'll be a while longer before the drama fully subsides and the pre-spring ball vacation is here.

News/notes/team reports
  • Arizona's DaVonte' Neal is changing positions to help a thinned-out Wildcats defense. Read about the switch here.
  • .One of Arizona State's biggest victories this recruiting season came through the signing of defensive tackle prospect Joseph Wicker.
  • Is Cal football trying to mimic how Stanford recruits?
  • Colorado's series with an in-state rival is likely to end after 2020.
  • More signing day aftermath: This piece examines Oregon's slow-and-steady recruiting style.
  • A developing Oregon State trend: Polynesian players. The Beavers just signed eight of them.
  • Offensive lineman Kevin Reihner has exercised a graduate transfer to Penn State, and David Shaw indicated that he's not the only Stanford player who's been mulling his future options.
  • Chronicling UCLA's Jeff Ulbrich/Roquan Smith saga.
  • When it comes to recruiting, Steve Sarkisian has finished strong at USC.
  • Grading Utah's coaches for their 2014 performance while looking ahead to 2015.
  • Chris Petersen believes he has something special at Washington in Jake Browning.
  • Washington State has lost wide receivers coach Dennis Simmons to Oklahoma.
Just for fun

Here's another "my, how times have changed" glimpse at college football, featuring a former USC Heisman Trophy winner.

The turnover battle is the consummate game within the game. You want them. Coaches love them. They can be momentum-swinging game-changers.

However, they can also be wasted drives. Sure, a turnover is nice because you take the ball out of the hands of the opposing offense. But if you can’t turn those turnovers into points, you’re just using clock. And with so many up-tempo offenses in the Pac-12, that’s not always that big of a deal.

Obviously, points off of turnovers aren’t the end-all-be all. Sometimes a turnover can end a game, such was the case with Scooby Wright stripping Marcus Mariota or J.R. Tavai’s strip-sack of Kevin Hogan. No points were scored, yet it decided the outcome. Washington State was one of the best teams in the conference at converting turnovers into points (75 percent). Problem is, the Cougars only forced eight all year.

So don’t take the following stats as cannon. Rather, they are a decent indicator of how your team did in 2014 at turning turnovers into points. Earlier today we looked at the Pac-12 South. Now we look at the North. And tomorrow, we’ll flip the script and look at points allowed following a turnover.

If you’re curious, here are last year’s totals so you can see if your team improved or regressed.


Turnovers created: 17
Scores vs. opportunities: 9-17 (52 percent)
Total points after turnovers: 65
Games without forcing at least one turnover: 2
Games without points after turnovers: 4


Turnovers created: 34
Scores vs. opportunities: 25-34 (73 percent)
Total points after turnovers: 164
Games without forcing at least one turnover: 1
Games without points after turnovers: 2

Oregon State

Turnovers created: 18
Scores vs. opportunities: 11-18 (61 percent)
Total points after turnovers: 60
Games without forcing at least one turnover: 3
Games without points after turnovers: 1


Turnovers created: 16
Scores vs. opportunities: 8-16 (50 percent)
Total points after turnovers: 44
Games without forcing at least one turnover: 5
Games without points after turnovers: 1


Turnovers created: 29
Scores vs. opportunities: 18-29 (62 percent)
Total points after turnovers: 109
Games without forcing at least one turnover: 3
Games without points after turnovers: 1

Washington State

Turnovers created: 8
Scores vs. opportunities: 6-8 (75 percent)
Total points after turnovers: 34
Games without forcing at least one turnover: 5
Games without points after turnovers: 2