Groundhog Day for the Yankees in Game 3
The Yankees are caught in what has become their October version of Groundhog Day: strong pitching and anemic hitting. As a fan, it's exhausting and frustrating. As a writer, it's a challenge to come up with a new spin on the same story which has played itself out for the past 10 days.
If you had told me going into Tuesday night's ALCS Game 3 that the Yankees would get a home run from Eduardo Nunez off Justin Verlander, Robinson Cano would break his 0-for-the-last-six-games streak and the Yankees would have Raul Ibanez at the plate in the top of the ninth needing a key hit to tie or take the lead, I'd take that scenario every time.
As Ibanez and his magic baseball bat stepped to the plate against Phil Coke, I wondered: Could it be? Was it happening again? But Raul did not come through, ending a tough 2-1 loss by striking out swinging on a nasty 3-2 slider. The Yankees now find themselves down 3-0 in the ALCS and facing elimination Wednesday night in Detroit with CC Sabathia taking on Max Scherzer.
Many have questioned Girardi's decision to let Ibanez bat against a lefty with A-Rod available off the bench. We can argue platoon splits and matchups until we're blue in the face (and the Tigers would certainly have countered with righty Joaquin Benoit if A-Rod were to pinch hit). The story for every game remains the same -- the team cannot hit. After eight postseason games, the Yankees' batting average is .200.
For the record, I liked Tuesday night's "To hell with it, why not?" lineup. It may not have made the most sense, but the previous lineups hadn't been producing, so credit Girardi for shaking things up. Benching the struggling Nick Swisher for Brett Gardner added potential spark to the lineup and improved outfield defense. A-Rod for Eric Chavez did create some questions, but I have a feeling the reports that A-Rod was hitting on women in the crowd after his benching in Game 1 factored into Girardi's decision.
Nunez at shortstop instead of Jayson Nix caused a bit of consternation on my Facebook feed -- it turns out his defense saved at least one run and his bat provided the only run the Yankees would score against Verlander. Isn't 20/20 hindsight the best? Here's a fun fact: Verlander has given up only two runs this postseason -- solo home runs by Coco Crisp and Nunez.
Even with the changes and the unorthodox lineup, the Yankees still couldn't break through until the ninth inning. Fans can take some comfort in knowing they showed some patience at the plate and had some nice at-bats (Nunez had a great at-bat before launching his home run to left field). But the Yankees have scored in exactly two innings of the 30 played in this ALCS -- the ninth inning of Game 1 and the ninth inning of Game 3.
Of course credit should go to Verlander, who gave up just three hits and struck out three (with no walks) in 8 1/3 innings on his way to a season-high 132 pitches. Detroit's starters have dominated the Yankees for the first three games of the series. The Tigers haven't exactly been lighting up the scoreboard themselves, but they've gotten the key hits when needed and haven't relied exclusively on the home run (of course Delmon Young's two home runs have been killers).
One of my friends posted some encouragement Tuesday night on my Facebook wall. “With CC going tomorrow and Andy going on Thursday, we should get this series back to New York for Game 6," he wrote. In previous years, I'd agree and feel confident. But with the way the team is hitting, that confidence has waned. The Yankees haven't held a lead in any of the games this series.
Can CC deliver a pitching performance good enough to force a Game 5 and avoid the team's first postseason sweep since 1980? Absolutely. But can the bats come through against Scherzer? If we're following the Groundhog Day script, then we have the answer to that question. Here's hoping the Yankees flip the script for just one night.